Here's the thing about James Bond: he's the most recast role in cinema history, and yet every single time it happens, the entire planet loses its collective mind. It's a casting decision that somehow matters more than who runs the country. And for every actor who did get the tuxedo, there's a long trail of blokes who came terrifyingly close - and in many cases, would have been absolutely phenomenal.

Let's pour one out for the Bonds that never were.

Cary Grant - The Original "No, Thanks"

When Ian Fleming wrote James Bond, he basically described Cary Grant in a dinner jacket. Suave, dangerous, impossibly handsome, the kind of man who could kill someone and still make it to the opera on time. When Cubby Broccoli started shopping Dr. No around in the early '60s, Grant was the dream.

Grant said no. He was 58, already semi-retired, and - crucially - he only wanted to do one film. Broccoli needed a franchise player, not a one-and-done. So they went with some Scottish bodybuilder nobody had heard of called Sean Connery, and the rest is history.

Would Grant have been a great Bond? Obviously. But we'd never have got the raw, almost feral energy Connery brought. Grant's Bond would have been champagne; Connery's was single malt with a fist behind it.

Clint Eastwood - The American Problem

Eastwood was genuinely offered the role in the late '60s when Connery was threatening to walk. He turned it down because - and this is actually quite noble - he believed Bond should be British. "An American can't play Bond," he said, which is the most un-American thing an American has ever said.

He was right, of course. Bond is fundamentally British in a way that transcends accent. It's the casual cruelty, the emotional repression disguised as sophistication, the ability to order a martini like you're declaring war. Americans can't do that. They're too earnest.

Eastwood went on to make Dirty Harry instead, which is essentially American Bond with more .44 Magnum and less shagging. Everyone won.

Sam Neill - So Close It Hurts

When Roger Moore finally hung up the eyebrow in the mid-'80s, the hunt for a new Bond came down to a handful of contenders. Sam Neill was right there in the mix - screen-tested, praised by producers, basically had the job wrapped up.

Then Timothy Dalton became available, and that was that. Neill was devastated, reportedly. He'd have been a fascinating Bond - darker, more cerebral, with that slightly unsettling quality he later brought to Jurassic Park and In the Mouth of Madness. His Bond would have been the literary Bond, the cold-blooded killer who happens to own a nice suit.

Instead, Dalton got two films, neither of which made the money the studio wanted, and Neill went on to run from dinosaurs. Life's funny like that.

Pierce Brosnan - The First Time Around

Yes, Brosnan eventually got the role. But he was supposed to get it a decade earlier. When Dalton was first cast in 1986, Brosnan was the producers' first choice. He'd been essentially told the part was his. Contracts were being drawn up. Champagne was probably on ice.

Then NBC renewed Remington Steele specifically because the publicity around Brosnan's Bond casting had boosted its ratings. His contract locked him in. He couldn't do both. The role went to Dalton, and Brosnan had to wait until 1995.

It's one of the great "what ifs" because 1986 Brosnan was different from 1995 Brosnan. Younger, sharper, less polished. His Bond might have been rawer, less quippy. We got the suave, smirking GoldenEye version instead - which was great, don't get me wrong - but early Brosnan could have been something special.

Idris Elba - The One The Internet Demanded

For about fifteen years, the internet collectively decided that Idris Elba should be Bond. And honestly? They weren't wrong. The man has more screen presence in his left eyebrow than most actors have in their entire body. He's got the physicality, the charm, the menace, the ability to wear a suit like it owes him money.

So why didn't it happen? Partly timing - by the time Craig's tenure ended, Elba was already in his fifties, and Eon typically wants someone who can do at least three or four films. Partly politics, though nobody at the studio would ever say that out loud. And partly because Elba himself seemed increasingly lukewarm about it, possibly because being defined as "the guy who should be Bond" for over a decade gets exhausting.

The tragedy is that Elba in his early forties - right around the Luther peak - would have been one of the all-time great Bonds. Dangerous, unpredictable, and with that simmering fury that Fleming always wrote into the character but most actors smoothed over.

Henry Cavill - The Prettiest Runner-Up

When Daniel Craig was cast in 2005, the final shortlist reportedly included a young, relatively unknown Henry Cavill. He was 22 at the time - too young, the producers decided, for the gritty reboot they had in mind. Craig's weather-beaten brutality won out over Cavill's devastating cheekbones.

Cavill went on to do The Man from U.N.C.L.E., which is essentially a Bond audition tape that Guy Ritchie accidentally turned into a feature film. He's magnificent in it - all coiled charm and casual violence. He later proved with Mission: Impossible - Fallout that he can do action at an elite level. That bathroom fight scene? That's Bond energy.

Now he's in his forties, still absurdly handsome, and still somehow hasn't played Bond. At this point it feels personal.

Chiwetel Ejiofor - The One Nobody Talks About

While everyone was banging the drum for Elba, Chiwetel Ejiofor was quietly being one of the best actors of his generation. Watch Dirty Pretty Things. Watch Serenity. Watch 12 Years a Slave. The man can do vulnerability, rage, charm, and menace, sometimes in the same breath.

His Bond would have been the most psychologically complex version of the character we'd ever seen. Less action hero, more damaged spy who happens to be very good at killing people. The literary Bond, essentially - the one Fleming wrote as a "blunt instrument" haunted by his own violence.

Nobody seriously considered him, as far as we know, which says more about the industry's imagination than it does about Ejiofor's talent.

Tom Hiddleston - The Audition That Backfired

Around 2015-2016, Tom Hiddleston was the bookies' favourite to replace Craig. Then he appeared in The Night Manager, which was so obviously a Bond audition that it became a bit embarrassing. He was photographed wearing a "James Bond" expression on red carpets. He dated Taylor Swift. He basically campaigned for the role with the subtlety of a sledgehammer.

And that, apparently, killed it. Bond producers have historically preferred actors who don't seem desperate for the role. Connery didn't campaign. Craig didn't campaign. Brosnan had the good grace to be contractually trapped elsewhere. Hiddleston wanted it too visibly, and in the strange psychology of Bond casting, that's fatal.

Shame, really. He'd have been a perfectly good Bond. Not great, maybe - there's something slightly too nice about him - but competent. Like a Brosnan with better acting chops.

The Pattern Nobody Admits

Here's what connects all these near-misses: Bond casting has never been purely about talent or even suitability. It's about timing, availability, contractual obligations, studio politics, and - let's be honest - occasionally cowardice. The producers consistently choose the safe option, then get credit when it works out.

Craig was considered a disaster before Casino Royale - "James Blonde," remember? Now he's regarded as possibly the best Bond after Connery. The internet would have imploded with joy over Elba, but Eon went a different direction. Cavill was right there in 2005 and they let him walk.

The truth is, almost anyone on this list would have made a brilliant Bond, because the role is bigger than any individual actor. It's a framework: put a charismatic man in a suit, give him a gun and a one-liner, point him at a villain with a ludicrous plan, and let the machine do its work. The actor matters less than the producers will ever admit.

Who Should Be Next?

As of writing, the next Bond still hasn't been announced, and the rumour mill is churning out names like a particularly unreliable slot machine. Aaron Taylor-Johnson. Regé-Jean Page. Josh O'Connor. Some lad from a Netflix series you haven't watched.

Here's our prediction: whoever they pick, the internet will hate it. Then the first trailer will drop, everyone will change their mind, and we'll all pretend we were on board from the start. It's the Bond casting cycle, and it's been repeating since 1962.

The only certainty is that whoever doesn't get it will end up on a list like this one, twenty years from now, with fans insisting they would have been the greatest Bond who ever lived.

And they'll probably be right.

Related Articles